Friday, May 16, 2008 |
|
(Video) From the book, "STUPID Liberals ALWAYS do the same thing..." |
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
10:23 PM |
|
Personally I find it stunning that they never learn.
Whenever Bush makes a speech, even if he doesn't refer to them, name their names, say anything about them... they jump up and say, "I am NOT they way you describe me to be!!!!!!"
Have you ever noticed?
Like when the President uttered the words in the State of the Union referring to the fact that Iraq had sought uranium in AFRICA? Immediately that weekend Joe Wilson the mint julep queen goes on Andrea Mitchell, and starts talking about how the President was referring to his trip to NIGER. (Last I checked Africa is a wee bit bigger than Niger.)
Yesterday the President makes a comment that could have included most of Western Europe, ALL of Eastern Europe, and God only knows who else across the spectrum. He could have been referring to the Arab nations even neighboring Israel - the nation to whom he was speaking. He NEVER mentioned Barack Obama, The United States, or the Democratic Party... so what do American liberals do?
They blow their lids. Biden, Pelosi, Clinton, Obama, and Obama's nasty-faced campaign staffers ALL run out like spoiled brats screaming at television cameras, "HOW DARE HE TALK ABOUT US THAT WAY?"
They were indignant, insufferable, indiscreet, and very unintelligent in their presentations. Even television liberals - who sometimes (not often) still actually check the text of speeches - had drank the kool-aid, and then tried to say Bush HAD referred to Obama by citing his Press Secretary DENYING that he had referred to Obama. How the heck does that even work?
"Bush referred to Obama..."
"Where in his text did he refer to Obama?"
"No where he just was..."
"Sorry but the language of his speech doesn't refer to any person specifically..."
"Yeah but he was referring to Obama."
"No I don't believe he referred to anyone specifically."
"SEE YOU JUST DENIED IT - that PROVES he was referring to Obama..."
Then you add to that the Pelosi presser, the Clinton presser, and the nasty-face Obama campaign staffers all out there snarling - telling everyone how "beneath the dignity of the office" it was for Bush to attack Obama - on foreign soil. (To which he did not...)
And the foreign soil thing comes up... See - when the Dixie Chicks stand on stage somewhere and they actually NAME the President, and the United States, and actually, specifically refer to our foreign policy as being an embarrassment - that is the textbook definition of being unpatriotic. Now they all wanna say Bush did the same thing, but with no references to the United States, Barack Obama, the US' foreign policy - or anything even remotely resembling an attack on another U.S. Citizen, elected official, or even candidate.
Can SOMEONE PLEASE explain to me what the heck the liberals' problem is?
If you've got John Kerry, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama, and Obama's nasty-face campaign staffers all out there gettin' all uppity about President Bush saying something - HE NEVER SAID - doesn't that bode poorly for their potential to handle an actual crisis someday?
I was on the road between DC and NYC last night listening to the debate on many of the news outlets... Mark Steyn actually said it best on Hannity and Colmes - but I have not yet been able to find the footage. But a close second had to be Newt's opening round with kool-aid drinker Alan Colmes... watch and learn people. Watch and learn... liberals are just thick-headed less than genius types and running circles around them gets really easy - when they make such bone-headed blunders...
|
|
|
Monday, November 12, 2007 |
|
LIBS: "Don't Call me LIBERAL!" |
|
Posted by:
Kevin McCullough at
10:44 AM |
|
But if it looks like duck, swims like a duck, and waddles like a duck in pantsuits...
“You can be as liberal as much as you like, if you are a Democrat, as long as you don’t call yourself a liberal,” Nunberg quipped.
To Nunberg and his fellow liberal — or progressive — Berkeley linguist George Lakoff, the presidential election of 2008 may mark the ascension of the Democratic Party, but not of “liberalism.”
“They are running from the word liberal as fast as they can because it has been tainted. It’s ‘bleeding-heart liberal,’ ‘tax-and-spend liberal,’ ‘liberal elite,’ ‘liberal media,’” Lakoff said, who has been a rhetorical consultant for Democrats in the past decade.
|
|
|
Tuesday, September 04, 2007 |
|
Letters from Liberals (Content Warning for Rough Language and Idiocy) |
|
Posted by:
Mary Katharine Ham at
9:50 AM |
Yesterday was a big day for them. I'll start with the one I got right before I went to bed last night, subject line: Texas Straw Poll. Maybe you can discern for me what this has to do with the straw poll.
Absolutely dispicable. How much did this administration pay you for endorsing this travesty in Iraq. You know Mary from the 1.5 million killed there in the last 10 years and the scenes on European Cable it looks bad. The woman and children killed, maimed is the worst I think. Your a supporter of this travesty, grab a gun and go chickenhawk. Maybe one of your kids. Then YOU can sit in your empty house wondering when/if they make that call you dread. FUCK YOU you sell out piece of shit! Anyone that can endorse the methodical genocide of a people is filth. PERIOD! And, then a couple of delightful e-mails from a new liberal friend of mine, sent throughout the day yesterday. In response to my appearance on CNN Sunday night, I get this:
Typical female conservative. No brains, usually fake tits and got all her facts wrong!
His RUV's are hybrids!
He meant "SUVs," and he's talking about John Edwards. They never are the greatest spellers. I rarely write back to the rude ones, but I was in a kicky mood:
The Chrysler Pacifica is NOT a hybrid, so that would make you wrong. You,
liberal male, are whiny, classless, and misogynistic. You do your side no
good talking about people's tits. Have a good one. John Edwards has two SUVs, according to his own campaign, only one of which is hybrid. My correspondent responded several times to that short note:
And I love when you spew your one sided logic.
"Report: Sen. Larry Craig, arrested on suspicion of lewd conduct in a men's
airport bathroom in June.
Facts the media will not let you miss: He's a Republican. He's married. He's
conservative."
I have seen the same bullshit come out of you whenever given the
chance! You are a one-sided, misguided, very immature little girl. When you
grow up and really see how the really world works. Maybe then I'll continue
our debate!
You just don't get it! Uh, dude. It's not a debate when you start it with talking about my "tits." Rule of thumb. And, again:
And why in the world would you consider a liberal male a woman
hater? Because unsecurities in this lopsided world about breast size seems
to be what a woman thinks her worth is. Her tit size! Only you could AGAIN
get something wrong.
You seem to do this a lot! Liberal men hate being called misogynists when they're acting like misogynists. "But, I'm liberal. I can't be one!" Me again:
Um, I don't know...I reckon it was the wholly irrelevant mention of
breasts in your first missive while addressing an unrelated
political disagreement. You're wrong again, but thanks for playing, Joel.
Being liberal doesn't automatically protect you from being a sexist ass. You
seem to do it a lot.
Also, it's "insecurity," not "unsecurity." Wrong again!
Have a good one. And, the valiant Joel again:
Only a pompous ass would make such a thing about a word getting past the
Spellchecker button. And then act like it was a major thing. (O sorry, that
is a conservative trait!) Yet not have the moral being of a slug to address
the fact that she's a liar! You were a joke this morning. Now you're a joke
this afternoon!
You are a liar, and I won't make the comment about your fake tits and
your INSECURITIES again!
I only wish you spent more time in history class then English! And, me:
Ha ha, try to calm down and have a good Labor Day. Take some deep breaths
and have a beer.
I have already addressed what you think is a "lie." According to the
Edwards campaign, he owns two SUVs, one of which is hybrid and one of which is not. Your information is incorrect; they are not all hybrids, according
to Edwards himself.
Go eat some barbecue and try to let it set in. Chill. He wrote back once more to assure me that Edwards only owns one hybrid SUV, and that one belongs to his daughter, despite the fact that every news report had the Edwards campaign conceding he owns two SUVs. Mercifully, he didn't mention my "tits" again.
Yeah, I know. I shouldn't rile the trolls, but I was provoked. Ha. Hope y'all had a more fun and restful Labor Day than Angry Joel did.
Update: Oh, I forgot about this one, from the same guy:
I read about Michael Moore. How he only picks what facts support his
story. You call the kettle black huh? I heard you say "He has two SUV's" You
never once spoke the truth!
So just like Michael Moore, you pick and choose what facts support your
story! You are no better then any other liar! And your tits are ugly!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 2 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 15 Minutes 5 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 16 Minutes 22 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 29 Minutes 13 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 32 Minutes 38 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives Archives
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
| | | |